![]() ![]() However, at the beginning of theĢ0th century, in pursuit of modern typographic forms, which like all the Therefore, considering that the period of familiarity with the humanist letterforms has been continuous since their establishment, the maxim from the dawn of the digital era can be regarded as valid.įor centuries of practice, typography was based on and examined On the other hand, the period of exposure to uncommon letterforms also has a positive impact on legibility. The universal letter structure, recognised by Frutiger as the prototype skeleton, is the constant that a priori provides legibility. ![]() The results confirmed that one’s familiarity with a typeface influences one’s reading speed. ![]() The experiment was conducted using for this purpose designed typefaces as stimuli, and the eye-tracking on-screen reading technology. We ran repeated measures tests with exposure period in-between. ![]() This paper examined the legibility in the context of familiarity – is it affected by the time of exposure to a particular typeface or a typeface’s universal structure. At the threshold of the digital era, Zuzana Licko was of the opinion that familiar letterforms owe legibility to centuries-long exposure and that all new, prototypically unmatching forms would be equally legible if used as frequently. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |